Relative TSR PSU: what it costs to book, and what it will likely pay

Hypothetical plan for Chipotle against its 16 disclosed pay peers. Prices through 2026-09-18. 100,000 simulated three-year futures. Generated 2026-09-19.
$44.97
Grant-date fair value per target share
135% of the $33.43 stock price
29%
of futures pay zero
49%
pay target or better
27%
pay the maximum
Payout distribution

Three checks before trusting any of it

Two questions, two answers

What it costs to book
Fair value run, risk-free growth.
Expected payout 96.6%
Median 3-yr TSR -3.9%
What it will likely pay
Forecast run, 8% growth (assumed).
Expected payout 98.1%
Median 3-yr TSR +5.6%

The odds of zero are 28.8% in both. Rank only cares about relative performance. What changes is whether the executive also made money.

One assumption removed

Pretend the peers don't move together and fair value becomes $47.39, +5.4%. Same error as treating tournament games as independent coin flips.

What is random in this model

Ranking is the hard part. There is no formula for where one stock lands among sixteen correlated others; you have to play the future out and count. That is why this is a simulation and not a spreadsheet.

Correlation heatmap

What was measured, what came from the plan, what was assumed

Stock price$33.43measured
Chipotle volatility35.4%measured
Peer volatility, median31.3%measured
Correlation to peers, mean0.28measured
Dividend yields17 of 17 tickersmeasured
Risk-free rate4.83%measured
Payout curve, cap, averagingfrom plan_terms.mdplan
Real-world return8.0%ASSUMED

Assumptions I made that you did not give me

Demonstration of method on public data. Not a valuation for financial reporting; a valuation firm validates and signs the version you would file. Chipotle's actual 2025 PSU is an operating-metric award with a relative TSR cap against the S&P 500; the negative-TSR cap and the peer-group ranking here are features of the hypothetical design.